Santana v. State

OPINION

BARTEAU, Judge.

Vincente Santana appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, of murder. He has raised the following issues:

1. Did the trial court commit fundamental error when it failed to provide the jury with a voluntary manslaughter instruction?

2. Did the trial court commit fundamental error when it provided the jury with a voluntary intoxication instruction?

3. Did Santana receive ineffective assistance of counsel?

We affirm.

FACTS

The facts which are most favorable to the verdict indicate that in January of 1991, Vin-cente Santana (‘Vincente”) and Mary Santana (“Mary”), although…