Legal Opinion

Incardona v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 22, 1986No. 85-2720PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

This appeal presents the question of whether appellant’s deceased daughter was entitled to uninsured motorist protection under appellant’s automobile insurance policy which was issued by appellee. The court below ruled in favor of appellee and held that coverage did not exist. We reverse.

Appellant’s daughter, Margaret Incardo-na, was killed in an automobile accident that was caused solely by the negligence of an uninsured third-party driver. At the time of the accident, Margaret was driving her own automobile which was separately insured under another automobile insurance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. BennettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. QueenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. GOVT. EMP. INS. COMPANY v. WrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Bolin v. Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. DeLuna v. Valiant InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API