In re Maringolo
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKEL, District Judge.
The petitioners for habeas corpus are in prison under warrants by the Immigration and Naturalization Service pending deportation proceedings which must inevitably be delayed for some months from now. They complain that their confinement is unlawful because the determination that each must post a $25,000 bond as a condition of release amounts in the circumstances to an abuse of the discretion over such matters confided to the Attorney General and his delegates. They concede in this argument that the matter does lie in executive *1390discretion, subject only to broad outer…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- McGrath v. KristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Wong Wing Hang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- United States Ex Rel. Kaloudis v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. Mamdouh Barbour v. District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, San Antonio, Texas, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Bartholomeu v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- SAN MARTINBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974
- TOSCANO-RIVASBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1973
- Martinez Ex Rel. Rodriguez-Sanchez v. BellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.