Legal Opinion

Neese v. Guillory

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1975No. 10163PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAILES, Judge Pro Tem.

This action, together with the companion suit, is to recover judgment for the damage inflicted on the appellee’s (Neese) vehicle. In the companion suit which was consolidated for trial with this action in district court and for argument in this Court, the appellant (Guillory, Sr.) seeks to recover from appellees damages to his vehicle.

The trial court determined that the accident was caused solely by the negligent operation of the Guillory vehicle. Judgment was rendered in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company in the sum of $2,342.80, and Clifford J.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Mayon v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. MeinkeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Guillory v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API