Legal Opinion

Williams v. Village Creek, White River & Mayberry Levee & Drainage District

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 11, 1985No. 84-246PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The question presented here is whether a drainage district may add lands, after the improvements have been completed, on the basis that the lands to be added benefit from the improvements. The answer to this question requires interpretation of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 21-514 (Repl. 1968), thus our jurisdiction rests on Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rule 29 l.c.

It is undisputed that the improvements constructed by the district were completed prior to its petition to add to the district lands owned by the appellants and others. There are provisions for adding lands…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bayou Meto Drainage District v. IngramSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Mudd v. St. Francis Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Commercial Bank, N.A. v. McGaughey Bros.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Mayberry Drainage District v. GrahamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API