Kaperonis v. Iowa State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
It is well known that there are no slums in Iowa. Yet it must be admitted that the property with which we are concerned in the instant case, if located elsewhere, would not have been entirely out of place in such a district. Its legal description is Lot 2, Block 18, East Sioux City, Sioux City, Iowa. It was improved — if we may so use the term — by two one and onerhalf story one-family dwelling houses and another structure which was divided into four apartments.
One of the defendant’s witnesses described the houses in these terms: “* * * they were in secondary condition, lack of paint and I…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hall v. City of West Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Korf v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Nedrow v. Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1953
3Cited by12 opinions
- Iowa Development Co. v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- Jones v. Iowa State Highway Commission Ex Rel. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- City & County of Honolulu v. Bishop Trust Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965
- Twin-State Engineering & Chemical Co. v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Dolezal v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.