Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Greathouse

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 16, 1993No. 1920361PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted Grady Lee Greathouse's petition for the writ of certiorari to review the affirmance by the Court of Criminal Appeals of his conviction of unlawful distribution of a controlled substance, to address two issues: (1) whether a comment by a codefendant's counsel regarding Greathouse's election not to testify violated Greathouse's constitutional privilege against self-incrimination, and (2) if so, whether that comment requires reversal. We hold that the comment was improper but that it was harmless; therefore, we affirm.

The relevant facts are stated in the opinion of the Court of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Carlos Garza De Luna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  5. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  2. Hutcherson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  3. Ex Parte HutchersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. Albarran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Land v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API