Legal Opinion

Tedesco v. Dry-Vac Sales, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCasey, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Best, J.), entered August 31, 1993 in Fulton County, which denied a motion by third-party defendant Harris Corporation for an order compelling plaintiffs’ expert witness to submit to an examination before trial and to produce certain documents.

The additional discovery sought by third-party defendant Harris Corporation from plaintiffs’ expert in this case is based on a claim of special circumstances (see, CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [iii]). The underlying action arose in July 1986 when plaintiff Stephen E. Tedesco (hereinafter plaintiff) was allegedly seriously…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rosario v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Flex-O-Vit USA, Inc. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Hallahan v. Ashland Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Adams Lighting Corp. v. First Central InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. The Hartford v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Melendez v. Food Emporium, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API