Legal Opinion

Mutulu Shakur v. Warden Ron Wiley

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 17, 2005No. 05-11002; D.C. Docket 04-00445-CV-RWS-1UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Mutulu Shakur, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition, in which he challenged the decision of the U.S. Parole Commission (“Commission”) denying him parole and continuing his reconsideration hearing for 15 years. 1 On appeal, Shakur raises the following issues: (1) that the Commission factually erred by miscalculating his time in custody in reaching its parole decision and determining his reconsideration date; (2) that the Commission engaged in impermissible double-counting by using the same criminal conduct both…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. John H. Gordon v. Jack Watson, III and George CanslerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Christopher T. Glumb v. Robert Honsted, Warden Fci, U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Anthony Calabro v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Meagher v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shakur v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API