Legal Opinion

Blair v. Shannon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1944No. Appeals, 89 and 90PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,

This is an appeal from a dismissal of a bill in equity. Appellants were legatees and devisees under the tenth paragraph of the last will and testament of William Shannon and as such they claimed that they were entitled to a certain interest in a “three foot vein” of coal underlying lands devised in that will and they asked for an accounting for all rents, issues and profits which may have been received by one of the appellees from the leasing, mining and sale of that coal.

Shannon, the testator, owned, inter alia, a tract of land of 230 acres. By an agreement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Groninger's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Copenhaver v. PendletonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  4. Hyde v. RaineySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McFerren EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Siple v. GreumelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Potts Run Coal Co. v. Benjamin Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Schick EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. In Re West Chestnut Realty of Haverford, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API