Legal Opinion
Watson v. VOUGA RESERVOIR ASSOCIATION
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided November 27, 1998No. 97CA1090PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge NEY.
Defendant, Vouga Reservoir Association (VRA), appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff, Woodrow Watson, based on its conclusion that the assessment of costs of maintenance of VRA’s reservoir was not authorized by §7-42-104(1), C.R.S.1998. Watson cross-appeals, challenging the trial court’s refusal to order VRA to return his shares in VRA and its calculation of the damages awarded to him. We reverse the judgment in favor of Watson.
VRA was organized under §7-42-101, et seq, C.R.S.1998, to build and maintain a reservoir. The majority shareholders owned…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lymburn v. Symbios LogicColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Colorado for Family Values v. MeyerColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Farmers Union Property v. Estate of MosherColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Unigard Security Insurance Co. v. Mission Insurance Co. TrustColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners v. KhanColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Nicholas v. North Colorado Medical Center, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Canal Insurance Co. v. NixColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.