Legal Opinion

UBANK v. FORENSIC STAT LABORATORY INC., MADHUKAR SHARMA, and GIANCARLO GASPARINI

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided August 2, 2026No. 1:25-cv-22594Unknown

1Opinion

SUONUITTEHDE RSTNA DTIESTS RDIICSTTR OIFC TF LCOORUIRDTA Case No. 25-cv-22594-BLOOM/Elfenbein UBANK, Plaintiff, v. FORENSIC STAT LABORATORY INC., MADHUKAR SHARMA, and GIANCARLO GASPARINI, Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER ON EX PARTE TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTARY AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINTS THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff UBank’s (“UBank”) Ex Parte Motion to Commence Proceedings Supplementary and For Leave to File Supplemental Complaint, ECF No. [95], (“Motion”). The Court has carefully considered the Motion, the record in this case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. General Trading Inc. v. Yale Materials Handling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. B & I Contractors, Inc. v. Mel Re Construction ManagementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Forster v. Nations Funding Source, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API