Publishers' Book Bindery, Inc. v. Ziegelheim
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
The judgment of the court below on the facts in dispute is fully sustained by the evidence. The court did not err in excluding the defendant’s son, while permitting the plaintiff’s treasurer (its main witness) to remain in the court room during the trial.
*560The fact that two papers, business records of the plaintiff, were received in evidence, but, by inadvertence, were not marked as exhibits, did not preclude their consideration as such by the trial court or by this court.
One of the issues in the case was the color of the bindings ordered. The papers received in evidence over objection were…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Murray v. DonlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Bishin v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Hayes v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1975
- In re the Accounting of KlausnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
- Hudson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.