Legal Opinion

American Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City v. Garland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1920No. 7819PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Matagorda County; Samuel J. Styles, Judge. Action by The American National Bank of Oklahoma City, Okl., against D. N. Garland. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

This suit was brought by the American National Bank, a corporation existing by virtue of the national banking laws of the United States, and having its domicile in Oklahoma county, state of Oklahoma, in the district court of Matagorda county, Tex., to recover of D. N. Garland the sum of $6,125, with interest, costs, and attorney’s fees, claimed to be due upon a judgment previously rendered by the district court of Oklahoma county, Okl., in the bank’s favor and against Garland and one E. N. Peery.

It was charged that Garland now resided in Matagorda county, where the venue was laid, but that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tempel v. DodgeTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Washington Life Ins. Co. v. LovejoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Blethen v. BonnerTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Estate Jones v. NealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Fitzgerald v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Minardus v. ZappCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Alsabrook v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Walker v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Minardus v. ZappCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API