Legal Opinion

Langle v. Kurkul

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 24, 1986No. 82-254Published

1Opinion of the Court

510 A.2d 1301 (1986)

William LANGLE, Jr.

v.

Walter KURKUL, Sr., William Kurkul, Walter Kurkul, Jr. and Gary Kurkul.

No. 82-254.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

January 24, 1986.

Reargument Denied February 25 and March 21, 1986.

Susan F. Eaton of Langrock Sperry Parker & Wool, Middlebury, for plaintiff-appellant.

Bartley J. Costello and S. Stacy Chapman, III, of Webber & Costello, Rutland, and Robert S. Burke and Edwin W. Free, Jr., of Richard E. Davis Associates, Barre, for defendants-appellees.

Before BILLINGS, C.J., and HILL, UNDERWOOD, PECK and GIBSON, JJ.

BILLINGS, Chief Justice.

In July of 1976, the…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API