Legal Opinion

State v. Fontes

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 2000No. 99-23PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The question certified by the court of appeals is whether “[p]ursuant to R.C. 2911.11(A), must the purpose to commit a criminal offense be formed at or before the time of trespass in an occupied structure or may it evolve during the course of the trespass?”

Appellant was charged and convicted of a violation of R.C. 2911.11(A)(1), which defines one of two ways that an offender can commit the offense of aggravated burglary. R.C. 2911.11 provides:

“(A) No person by force, stealth, or deception, shall trespass in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. FoustOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. StevensOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. RobersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API