Legal Opinion
25 West 24th Street Realty Corp. v. Gianquinto
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 2, 2017PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Orders, each entered March 21, 2016, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs.
The summary judgment record establishes that petitioner, the operator of a single room occupancy (SRO) facility located at 25 West 24th Street in Manhattan, entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU), dated October 31, 2013, with the City of New York, acting through the Department of Social Services of the Human Resources Administration (HRA). The MOU provided, inter alia, that petitioner “shall set aside . . . 30 of its rooms” for occupancy by eligible persons referred by HRA; and petitioner…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Branic International Realty Corp. v. PittNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Benjamin Shapiro Realty Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
4Cited by4 opinions
- 222 E. 12 Realty LLC v. McNallyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018
- Aimco 240 W. 73rd St., LLC v. KorenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018
- Einhorn v. McCloudAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
- PR 307 W. 93, LLC v. PeraltaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018