State v. Sandoval
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1DissentSutin, Judge
I dissent.
A. The admission of ,"one drink” of beer was prejudicial error.
“Reckless driving” is defined in § 64-22-3(A), N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 9, pt. 2). It reads:
Any person who drives any vehicle carelessly and heedlessly in willful or wanton disregard of the rights or safety of others and without due caution and circumspection and at a speed or in a manner so as to endanger or be likely to endanger any person or property is guilty of reckless driving. [Emphasis added]
Was “one drink” of beer an hour or more before the fatal accident admissible to prove the charge of homicide by vehicle…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. BrittonWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. RichersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. HendersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Betty Gensemer, Administratrix of the Estate of Paul Lewis Freeman, Deceased v. John v. Williams and Paul H. Rogers Paul H. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.