Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Sandoval

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 1975No. 1841Published

1DissentSutin, Judge

I dissent.

A. The admission of ,"one drink” of beer was prejudicial error.

“Reckless driving” is defined in § 64-22-3(A), N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 9, pt. 2). It reads:

Any person who drives any vehicle carelessly and heedlessly in willful or wanton disregard of the rights or safety of others and without due caution and circumspection and at a speed or in a manner so as to endanger or be likely to endanger any person or property is guilty of reckless driving. [Emphasis added]

Was “one drink” of beer an hour or more before the fatal accident admissible to prove the charge of homicide by vehicle…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. BrittonWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State v. RichersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. State v. HendersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Betty Gensemer, Administratrix of the Estate of Paul Lewis Freeman, Deceased v. John v. Williams and Paul H. Rogers Paul H. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API