Legal Opinion

Hearn v. Durrence

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 17, 1924No. 15561PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “The liability of a person who is . . a surety for a bankrupt shall not be altered by the discharge of such bankrupt.” Bankruptcy Act, § 16 (a) (U. S. Comp. St. § 9600); Nat. Surety Co. v. Medlock, 2 Ga. App. 665 (3 a) (58 S. E. 1131). It makes no difference under this section whether the creditor proves his claim and gets his dividend, as was done here, or fails to do so. He may proceed and collect the debt from the surety. 1 Collier, Bkr. (13th ed.), 585.

2. “A creditor holding a debt against a principal and deceased surety is under no duty to give notice of the existence of his debt to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crawford v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. McMillan v. Heard National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. National Surety Co. v. MedlockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Goodwyn v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dominion Culvert & Metal Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  2. Bradley v. Swift & CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API