Legal Opinion
Paul v. Sobol
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 22, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMercure, J.
Petitioner Saran A. Paul, a podiatrist, and his professional corporation, petitioner Saran A. Paul, P. C., were charged with five specifications of professional misconduct. Disciplinary hearings were held before the State Board for Podiatry, Office of Professional Discipline (hereinafter the Board), which unanimously concluded that petitioners were guilty of practic*840ing the profession of podiatry fraudulently, unprofessional conduct, and practicing the profession of podiatry with negligence on more than one occasion, and not guilty of practicing with gross negligence and incompetence on more…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wassermann v. Board of Regents of UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Brestin v. Commissioner of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Charlan v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Claffey v. Commissioner of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Abraham v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sung Ho Kim v. Board of Regents of UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Osher v. University of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Sanandaji v. SobolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990