Legal Opinion
Budd v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 15, 1955No. Nos. 15016, 15071PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIVES, Circuit Judge.
The opinion of the district Court in these cases is reported at 114 F.Supp. 865. The Budd case was the action first brought by the Secretary of Labor under Section 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act1 to enjoin the Budds from violating the minimum wage and record keeping provisions tif the Act. At the conclusion of a pre-trial conference on that case, the district court was of the opinion that the Budd company opera-, tion was in violation of the Act, but, in order to avoid putting the small farmers, whose tobacco was processed by the Budds, at an economic disadvantage to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Waialua Agr. Co., Limited v. Maneja Maneja v. Waialua Agr. Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Fleming v. Farmers Peanut Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- American Sumatra Tobacco Corp. v. ToneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dionne v. BlierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Joseph T. Budd, Jr., and Florence W. Budd, Co-Partners, Doing Business as J. T. Budd, Jr. And Company v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, King Edward Tobacco Company of Florida and May Tobacco Company, Intervenor v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Morris v. Meyers, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County2008