Legal Opinion

State v. Dickman

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 24, 2013No. AC 33781PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HARPER, J.

The defendant, Priscilla C. Dickman, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of four counts of forgery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-139.1 On appeal, the defendant claims: (1) there was insufficient evidence upon which to convict her of forgery in the second degree under § 53a-139 (a) (1); (2) the court improperly admitted documents under the business records exception to the hearsay rule; and (3) the state violated the defendant’s due process rights under the state and federal constitutions by failing to disclose…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. SaucierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dickman v. University of Connecticut Health CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  2. Peo v. MathewsColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State of Iowa v. Nichole Michelle HoskinsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2023
  4. State v. RiveraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API