State v. Dickman
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The defendant, Priscilla C. Dickman, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of four counts of forgery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-139.1 On appeal, the defendant claims: (1) there was insufficient evidence upon which to convict her of forgery in the second degree under § 53a-139 (a) (1); (2) the court improperly admitted documents under the business records exception to the hearsay rule; and (3) the state violated the defendant’s due process rights under the state and federal constitutions by failing to disclose…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. SaucierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dickman v. University of Connecticut Health CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Peo v. MathewsColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- State of Iowa v. Nichole Michelle HoskinsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2023
- State v. RiveraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014