Legal Opinion

Packers National Bank v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 30, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. Wm. Hutchinson, Judge. This is an appeal from judgment for defendants, rendered on a directed verdict on a Second trial of the case reported in 114 Iowa, 621. The facts of the case are there sufficiently stated.

1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.

The only argument made by counsel for appellant is that the decision of this court on the former appeal must control on the second triaí, and that on the former appeal it was held that the. question of sufficiency of the description of the mortgaged personal property was for the jury. We think this is not the proper interpretation to be put on the former opinion. The first division of that opinion relates to the error of the trial court in instructing the *504jury that they should, under certain circumstances, render a verdict for plaintiff for forty-two head of animals, although under the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ivins v. HinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Iowa Savings Bank v. Dunning & HartsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lee County Savings Bank v. Snodgrass Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Simon Casady & Co. v. German Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Summer Thomas v. LawlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Commercial Savings Bank v. Brooklyn Lumber & Grain Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Wertheimer Degen v. ShulticeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API