Boyle v. Pure Oil Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.
Appellants instituted this' suit against appellees to recover damages which they claimed to have suffered by reason of appellees having polluted the water used by them in the manufacture of ice in the city of Groesbeck. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to appellants’ petition. The only question, therefore, for determination, is whether, as against a general demurrer, appellants’ petition stated a cause of action.
Appellants alleged:
“That from January 1st, 1925, up to and including December 31, 1925, they owned and operated a manufactory and plant located in the town of Groesbeck in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Clark v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McWhirterTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. PowersTexas Supreme Court · 1907
- Kinnaird v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.