Legal Opinion

Askin Et Ux. v. Pittsburgh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1946No. Appeals, 51 and 52Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The wife-plaintiff was injured when a rotted board in a wooden sidewalk, broke under her as she stepped upon it. These appeals go to the entry of judgments for the city notwithstanding verdicts for plaintiffs. It is conceded that the wife-plaintiff is not chargeable with contributory negligence as a matter of law, and the only question raised is the negligence of the city.

Baldauf Street, a short dead-end street runs east and west along a hillside in a thickly populated section of Pittsburgh. The city gave little attention to its improvement; the roadway was too rough even…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lohr v. Philipsburg BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Rapho v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  3. Norristown v. MoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  4. Lohr v. Philipsburg BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. Smith v. Muncy Creek TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API