Legal Opinion

Local No. 261, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Schulze

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

Unless the “escape” clause in the maintenance-of-membership provisions of the collective-bargaining contract superseded article 6, section 16, of the constitution of the International Union, the plaintiff Union is entitled to prevail in this action. This is because the defendant, upon becoming a member of the plaintiff Union, became bound by all legal provisions of the International Union’s constitution by reason of the membership application blank which she had signed.

Such constitution constitutes a binding contract between the Union and its members. Herman v. United Automobile, A. & A. I.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Masters, Mates & Pilots of America, Local No. 2Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Mandracio v. Bartenders Union, Local 41California Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Herman v. United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement WorkersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Government & Civic Employees Organizing Committee, CIO v. WindsorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Bires v. BarneyOregon Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. LOCAL 248 UAW v. NatzkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Fray v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. WoychikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Lodge 78 of International Ass'n of Machinists v. NickelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Local 31, National Ass'n of Broadcast Employees & Technicians v. TimberlakeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API