Legal Opinion

Hutchins v. Lavery

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1912Published

Action for injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, J.

This action 'is brought to restrain defendants from their present use of water conducted from a spring on the George H. Williamson farm through pipes and pump logs.

The Muzzy spring is the principal'source of a brook which flowed through the George H. Williamson farm and through the lands of the plaintiffs. On the George H. Williamson *519farm was the “ Chapman spring,” which discharged its waters into the brook running from the Muzzy spring. In or about 1812 a wooden curbing was placed in the Chapman spring, and the waters of this spring were used in part through two hydraulic rams to supply…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Casler v. . ShipmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Hall v. . AugsburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Ely v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Hoyt v. CarterNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Waffle v. PorterNew York Supreme Court · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API