Legal Opinion
Anoushfar v. Lexington Insurance Company
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided August 20, 2025No. 2:23-cv-01003Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION SHAHRIAR ANOUSHFAR, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 2:23-cv-1003-SPC-NPM LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. / OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are Defendant Lexington Insurance Company’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 64) and Plaintiff Shahriar Anoushfar’s Response in Opposition (Doc. 67). For the reasons articulated below, the Court grants the motion. Legal Standard “After the pleadings are closed—but early enough not to delay trial—a party may move for judgment on the pleadings.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c).…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Christopher Cannon v. City of West Palm Beach, and W.H. Krick, in His Individual CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Blanchard v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Major Saxton, Jr., Mary Saxton v. Acf Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Vest v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
- QBE Insurance Corp. v. Chalfonte Condominium Apartment Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.