Legal Opinion
Associated Mortgage Bankers, Inc. v. Ben Carson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 17, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2020-0744Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ASSOCIATED MORTGAGE BANKERS, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 20-cv-00744 (ESH) v. BEN S. CARSON, SR., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is a motion to dismiss brought by defendants the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and Ben S. Carson, Sr., in his official capacity as HUD’s Secretary (collectively, “defendants”). Plaintiff Associated Mortgage Bankers, Inc. (“AMB”) brings this action to seek review of a decision by an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) that AMB is required under an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lucia v. SECSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Florida Audubon Society v. Lloyd M. Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury, and Margaret Richardson, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.