Legal Opinion

State v. Watson

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 20, 2008No. 97,849PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Malone, J.:

Wayne Watson appeals his conviction of theft of property valued between $1,000 and $25,000. Watson claims: (1) The district court violated his right to a speedy trial under the Uniform Mandatoiy Disposition of Detainers Act (UMDDA), K.S.A. 22-4301 et seq.; (2) the district court’s jury instructions on theft were clearly erroneous; (3) the district court erred in admit ting evidence at trial; and (4) Watson was denied a fair trial because of cumulative errors.

On October 28, 2005, Arick Galloway, a foreman for Stainless Steel Systems (Stainless Steel), located in Hutchinson, drove…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. EngelhardtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. State v. AckwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. State v. BryanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WaldrupCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  2. State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  4. State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  5. State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API