Legal Opinion

Berumen v. Los Angeles County Department of Health Services

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 2007No. B189886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WILLHITE, Acting P. J.

INTRODUCTION

This appeal raises the question whether the Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission (Commission) has jurisdiction to entertain a claim that an employee has been subject to a “constructive” or “de facto” demotion. Based upon the pertinent provisions of the Los Angeles County Charter and Civil Service Rules, we conclude that the Commission lacks jurisdiction to do so. We therefore affirm the judgment denying appellant’s petition for a writ of mandate compelling the Commission to hear her claim.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant Margaret…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Zuniga v. Los Angeles County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Hunter v. Los Angeles County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Hunter v. LA CIVIL SERVICE COMM.California Court of Appeal · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles Dept. of Health Services v. Civil Service Com. of County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Monsivaiz v. L.A. County Civil Service Com. (L.A. County Dept. of Ag. Comr.)California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Monsivaiz v. L.A. County Civil Service Com.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Monsivaiz v. L.A. County Civil Service Com.California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API