Hill v. State

Appellant was

convicted of unlawfully mating a single sale of intoxicating liquor in Grayson county after the prohibition law making it a felony was in effect therein, and his punishment assessed at the lowest prescribed by law.

[1,2] The court gave a correct charge, to which there is no objection. No bill of exception is in the record. The sole question attempted to be set up was in the motion for a new trial after conviction, in this: A very meager attempt was made to allege that appellant had before been convicted of the same offense. This was denied and contested by the state. No evidence…