Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. 269 West Seventy-second Street Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

Refrigerators were an essential part of the equipment of an apartment house furnished to the tenants from the moment of completion, and they were, therefore, embraced within the coverage clause of the mortgage, which read: “ All fixtures and articles of personal property now or hereafter attached to or used in connection with the premises.” The fact that the refrigerators were not in existence at the time the mortgage was executed does not affect the result. A valid mortgage may be imposed on after-acquired property. (Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. New York & Queens C. R. Co., 253 N. Y.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. New York & Queens County Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Diana Paper Co. v. Wheeler-Green Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Tonawanda Brewing Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API