Ewing & Gaines v. Trippe
Supreme Court of Georgia
Partnership. Promissory Notes. Notice. Yerdict. Before Judge Fain. Bartow Superior Court. January Adjourned Term, 1884. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford, Justice.
The plaintiffs in error brought their action against the defendants in error on a promissory note, dated January 26th, 1882, and due February 14th, 1882, for the sum of $280, payable to plaintiffs, which was signed in the firm name of W. M. Trippe & Oo. Trippe and Davis pleaded to this action that, in April, 1881, Tripp 3 sold out his interest in the firm to Whitehead and Davis, the other two members of the firm, and that the partnership was thereby dissolved; that in June, 1881, Davis sold out to Whitehead and retired from the firm. It was shown on the trial that no notice…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grady v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
- Ketcham v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Southwick & Wheelock v. McGovernSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Southern v. GrimIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- H. Amidown & Co. v. Osgood & MinardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burch v. Americus Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Bush & Hattaway v. McCarty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Pyron & Son v. RuohsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Askew v. SilmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Bank of Covington v. CannonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.