Legal Opinion
Martin v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 8, 1945No. Civ. No. 3297PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
On September 10, 1936, plaintiff and appellant made written application to defendant and respondent association for a policy of health and accident insurance. The application, signed by plaintiff, contained, among others, the following questions and answers; “Q. (9) Has any ap*558plication ever been made by you for life, accident, or health insurance been declined? (Answer to each) No-No - No.” “Q. (18) Do you hereby apply to the Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Insurance for a policy to be based upon the foregoing statement of facts and do you understand and agree that the falsity of any…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Telford v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Whitechat v. GuyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Wharton v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Boyer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burns v. Prudential InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Ashley v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1958