Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dusinberre v. Hunter

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1892No. 639PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Original Application for Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J. —

The application for the alternative writ of mandamus must be denied, for two reasons: First, Because it does not appear from the papers upon which the application is founded, that anything will be gained by its issuance. From such papers it appears that action is required of the court when sitting as such in the county of Lewis. It further appears that the judge will not be holding court in that county again until the October session thereof, and hence could not proceed in obedience to the alternative writ, or the peremptory one which might…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carpenter v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. The B. C. TerryDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1881
  3. State ex rel. Bauer v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API