Legal Opinion
In Re Rogers, Rendall Pitzen
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 1936No. 6339PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.
This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioners, T. H. Rogers, John Randall and F. G. Pitzen, allege that they are being restrained of their liberties by the sheriff of Latah County under an order of the probate-judge of said county, sitting as a committing magistrate, for a preliminary examination under a complaint, charging them with violation of see. 57-701, I. C. A., known as the Anti-Nepotism Law. The writ issued, return has been waived and the sheriff admits the facts as alleged in the petition, and an issue of law has been joined as fo whether or not the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Fidelity State Bank v. North Fork Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Fenton v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Shoshone Highway District v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Barton v. AlexanderIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- General Mortgage Corporation of Iowa v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- Dalton Highway Dist. of Kootenai County v. SowderIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Greater Boise Auditorium District v. Royal Inn of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Murtaugh Highway District v. Twin Falls Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
- District Board of Health of Public Health District No. 5 v. ChanceyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.