Legal Opinion
Schmoll v. Acands, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 23, 1988No. Civ. 86-1313-PAPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PANNER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Raymond Schmoll brings this products liability action against Raymark Industries Inc. and Raytech Corporation (Raytech). The issue is whether Raytech is liable as a successor for Raymark Industries’ production, sale and distribution of products containing asbestos. I find that Raytech is a successor in liability to Ray-mark Industries.
Plaintiff seeks damages against multiple defendants, including Raymark Industries and Raytech, for injuries allegedly caused by inhaling asbestos dust from products manufactured or sold by defendants. The parties stipulated…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Erickson v. Grande Ronde Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1939
- Dairy Co-Operative Ass'n v. Brandes CreameryOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Peterson v. HarvilleDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1977
3Cited by22 opinions
- Raytech Corporation v. Earl WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Lippe v. Bairnco Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- In Re Acushnet River & New Bedford Harbor Proceedings Re Alleged PCB PollutionDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- Celotex Corp. v. Hillsborough Holdings Corp. (In Re Hillsborough Holdings Corp.)District Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- National Gypsum Co. v. Continental Brands Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.