Legal Opinion
Tasso v. Aetna Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 2, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company has a duty to defend and indemnify the plaintiff in an action entitled Doe v Neilson, pending in the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, under Index No. 4416/94, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered December 20, 1996, which (1) granted the motion by the defendant Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, (2) declared that the defendant Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mount Vernon Fire Insurance v. Creative Housing Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- U.S. Underwriters Insurance v. Val-Blue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Pistolesi v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Ward v. Security Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by3 opinions
- Physicians' Reciprocal Insurers v. LoebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Watkins Glen Central School District v. National Union Fire Ins.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. RodickDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023