Harper v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKSTEIN, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of perjury. We affirm.
*73The perjury took place in a deposition wherein appellant testified he was struck by a car in 1988. The state produced an eyewitness, assumingly believed by the jury, who testified that he was appellant’s co-worker in resealing a road in a Broward County development when a woman moved the barricades and drove her car on the newly sealed road, messing it up. Angered by what the woman had done, appellant decided to claim he was struck and injured by the ear when, in fact, the co-worker testified that appellant got a wrench and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Glendening v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Jimenez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
3Cited by2 opinions
- McBean v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Hudson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996