Legal Opinion
State v. Bambrough
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 1, 1970No. 454PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
Defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief under § 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Supp.1969) claimed that parole authorities and penitentiary officials had improperly figured the time he had served on his sentence. The claim raised two issues: (1) time served on parole before being returned as a parole violator — see § 41-17-28, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 6), and (2) credit for “good time” — see § 42-1-54, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 6). Both issues are justiciable. See Conston v. New Mexico St. Bd. of Probation & Parole, 79 N.M. 385, 444 P.2d 296 (1968); Sneed v. Cox, 74 N.M.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sneed v. CoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- United States v. James Franklin LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- State v. MurrayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Bobby Ray Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- State v. SublettNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BarefieldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. DeatsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. HirschNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980