Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Crabtree

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1980No. 16405Published

1Concurrence

CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

(concurring with comments).

I agree with the main opinion in holding that the actions of Officer Rapich were justified on the basis of taking an inventory both from the standpoint of discharging his duties in a businesslike manner, and as a matter of due caution under the circumstances. However, inasmuch as defendant’s contention is that he was denied his constitutional protection from unreasonable searches and seizures, I add some comments thereon.

The real question to be addressed is whether the search was unreasonable under the circumstances.1 The standard which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. State v. EastmondUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. AllredUtah Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API