Legal Opinion

Gierke v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 1, 2019No. 2:19-cv-00071Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 ALIX GIERKE, CASE NO. C19-0071JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION v. FOR OREGON CHOICE OF LAW 12 ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND 13 CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 14 15 Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 Before the court is Defendant Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance 18 Company’s (“Allstate”) motion asking the court to recognize that Oregon law controls 19 the interpretation of the insurance policy at issue and the claims asserted in Plaintiff Alix 20 Gierke’s complaint. (See Mot. (Dkt. # 14); see also…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Smith v. Safeco Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Margie Daniel v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Coventry Associates v. Am. States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. McKee v. AT & T CORP.Washington Supreme Court · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API