Atkinson v. Beckett
West Virginia Supreme Court
cited 3 W. Ya. 285 ; 8 AY. Va. 474; 16 W. Ya. 245; 23 W. Ya. 617; 9 Am. Dec. 385 ; 11 AY. Ya. 122; 10 Leigh 93; 2 W. Ya. 25; 3 AY. Ya. 423 ; Id. 438; 16 Barb. 325 ; 2 Leigh 145; 1 H. & M. 1; 34 Cal. 270; 14 AY. Ya. 264. cited 33 AY. Ya. 152; 20 AY. Ya. 223 ; 24 AY. Ya. 551; 25 AY. Ya. 692 ; 33 AV. Ya. 543 ; 13 AV. Va. 231; 26'W. Va. 583; Code, c. 125, s. 136 ; 18 AY. Ya. 529 ; 30 AY. Ya. 666.
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Judge:
This case is a sequel of Atkinson v. Beckett, 34 W. Va. 584 (12 S. E. Rep. 717); and a brief reference to that caséis necessary to a proper understanding of the points involved in this appeal.
In May, 1883, plaintiffs Atkinson & Piersol brought their suit as judgment-creditors of the defendant AYilliam Beckett to set aside as fraudulent a conveyance from defendant AYilliam Beckett to his son AYilliam B. Beckett of the “Daniel Iiaymond” farm of two hundred and twenty six acres in Ritchie county. The relief prayed for was granted, and the deed was set aside. But the land was also…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Atkinson v. BeckettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
- Crook's v. TurpinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1850
3Cited by4 opinions
- Multiplex, Inc. v. Town of ClayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- Tate v. VanceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1876
- Tate v. VanceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1876
- Tate v. VanceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1876