Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Hunsberger

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 20, 1993No. 9129SC1294PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The issue here is whether summary judgment for defendants was proper. Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. N.C.R. Civ. P. 56; Lowe v. Bradford, 305 N.C. 366, 368-69, 289 S.E.2d 363, 365-66 (1982). “The evidence presented must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-movant.” Surrette v. Duke Power Co., 78 N.C. App. 647, 650, 338 S.E.2d 129, 131 (1986).

Here the forecast of evidence showed as follows: In the early morning hours of 15 February 1989, plaintiff Thomas Keith Gibson…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lowe v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Surrette v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cline v. DUNLORA SOUTH, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2012
  2. Lewis v. KrusselCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Wallen v. Riverside Sports CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Lewis v. KrussellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Tauchert v. Rumpke Sanitary Landfill, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API