Legal Opinion

Odom v. Pugh

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 30, 1983No. Civ. 3600PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADLEY, Judge.

The appeal is from a judgment in a boundary line dispute between coterminous landowners.

Thelma Pugh, plaintiff, is the record owner of the SW ¼ of the NE ¾4 of Section 8, Township 8 North, Range 3 East. Billy C. Odom, defendant, is the record owner of the SE ¼ of the NW Va of Section 8, Township 8 North, Range 3 East. On April 5, 1979 Mrs. Pugh filed a complaint against Odom and Chastain, seeking to establish the true boundary line between her property and the property owned by Odom. She also sought damages for trespass and the cutting of timber by Odom and Chastain. In her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lay v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  2. Jemison v. BelcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Smith v. ClaybrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Wiginton v. DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte State Dept. of Mental Health and Mental RetardationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  2. In Re MillerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Parham v. ParhamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  4. Millican v. BeatyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API