Legal Opinion

Yeaton v. Skillings

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 2, 1956No. 4499PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The defendant Skillings argues that in ruling his signatures on all the notes were admitted to be genuine, the Court erroneously applied Superior Court Rule No. 42 (99 N. H. 614) which reads as follows: “The signatures and indorsements of all written instruments declared on will be considered as admitted unless the defendant shall file a notice within three days after the return day at which the writ is entered that they are disputed.” The defendant claims this rule must be construed with Rule No. 41, which provides: “Any party proposing to use any written evidence upon the trial may file it…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nute v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. West Gate Village Ass'n v. DubiosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  3. Exeter Hospital v. HallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. Blanchard v. CalderwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  5. Chinburg v. ChinburgSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API