Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. All American Auto Rental

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 13, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The striking of an answer for failure to appear for depositions is an extreme remedy and should be employed only when the failure is willful and contumacious. However, in the case at bar, the conduct of the defendants in failing to appear for depositions for almost three years after the court-ordered date for depositions merits that sanction. The defendant Henry Heimstra purposefully avoided discovery by the plaintiffs for a period of over two years, which clearly rises to the level of contumacious conduct. When Heimstra made no effort to advise counsel of his whereabouts and attempts to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Horowitz v. Camp Cedarhurst & Town & Country Day School, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Jones v. BryceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Rugby Excavators, Inc. v. JulianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hutson v. Allante Carting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Burgess v. Rains-fordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Parente v. New York Times Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Schneider v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API