Rodriguez v. All American Auto Rental
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The striking of an answer for failure to appear for depositions is an extreme remedy and should be employed only when the failure is willful and contumacious. However, in the case at bar, the conduct of the defendants in failing to appear for depositions for almost three years after the court-ordered date for depositions merits that sanction. The defendant Henry Heimstra purposefully avoided discovery by the plaintiffs for a period of over two years, which clearly rises to the level of contumacious conduct. When Heimstra made no effort to advise counsel of his whereabouts and attempts to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Horowitz v. Camp Cedarhurst & Town & Country Day School, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Jones v. BryceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Rugby Excavators, Inc. v. JulianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hutson v. Allante Carting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Burgess v. Rains-fordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Parente v. New York Times Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Schneider v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995