Legal Opinion · Dissent

University of Maryland Medical System Corp. v. Kerrigan

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 28, 2017No. 3/17Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Adkins, J.,

which Barbera, C.J. and McDonald, J., join.

The Majority’s holding today has undermined the long-held recognition of a plaintiffs right to choose a venue. Maryland Rule 2-327(c) permits transfer of an action from one circuit court to another if the transfer “is for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and serves the interests of justice.” Cases from this Court considering the propriety of a change in venue have required that convenience and justice must strongly favor transfer. Leung v. Nunes, 354 Md. 217, 224, 729 A.2d 956 (1999). Most respectfully, I…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bland v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Odenton Development Company v. LamyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Johnson v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API