Francine Marxe v. C.W. Jackson, C.E. Yates, and at & T Communications, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
This appeal involves a challenge to a preliminary injunction granted by the district court in a title VII retaliation case. Appellants, Charles Jackson, Charles Yates, and American Telephone & Telegraph Communications Company (collectively AT & T), contend that the preliminary injunction was erroneously granted. They argue that the appellee, Francine Marxe, failed to demonstrate either likelihood of success on the merits or a threat of irreparable harm to herself. Marxe disagrees, contending that the district court correctly found both requirements…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Delaware River Port Authority v. Transamerican Trailer Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Apple Computer, Inc., a California Corporation v. Franklin Computer Corporation, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Leroy STEWART, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Anne M. Pavilonis v. Edward J. KingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Constructors Association Of Western Pennsylvania v. KrepsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Frank's Gmc Truck Center, Inc. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- David Adams v. Freedom Forge CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Linda Adam-Mellang v. Apartment Search, Inc. William DetersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Adams v. Freedom Forge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Delaware State Sportsmens Association Inc v. Delaware Department of Safety and Homeland SecuritCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.